Tuesday, April 12, 2011 at 3:35 AM
Webmaster level: Beginner - Intermediate
We recently hosted our second site clinic, this time at TechHub in London, UK. Like last year, here’s our summary of the topics that came up.
- Title tags and meta description tags are easy ways to improve your site's visibility in Google search results, yet we still see webmasters not fully utilizing their potential. We have a bit of help available about writing good page titles and descriptions which you can read to brush up on the subject. That said, you can ignore the meta keywords, at least as far as Google is concerned.
- One way Google's algorithms determine the context of content on a page is by looking at the page’s headings. The way semantic markup is used throughout a site, including h1, h2, and h3 tags, helps us to understand the priorities of a site’s content. One should not fret, though, about every single H tag. Using common sense is the way to go.
- Just as we recommend you structuring pages logically, it is similarly important to structure the whole website, particularly by linking to related documents within your site as necessary. This helps both users and search engine bots explore all the content you provide. To augment this, be sure to provide a regularly updated Sitemap, which can be conveniently linked to from your site’s robots.txt file for automatic discovery by Google and other search engines.
- Duplicate content and canonicalization issues were discussed for many websites reviewed at the site clinic. Duplicate content within a website is generally not a problem, but can make it more difficult for search engines to properly index your content and serve the right version to users. There are two common ways to signal what your preferred versions of your content are: By using 301 redirects to point to your preferred versions, or by using the rel="canonical" link element. If you’re concerned about setting your preferred domain in terms of whether to use www or non-www, we recommend you check out the related feature for setting the preferred domain feature in Webmaster Tools.
- Another commonly seen issue is that some sites have error pages which do not return an error HTTP result code, but instead return the HTTP success code 200. Only documents that are actually available should reply with the HTTP success result code 200. When a page no longer exists, it should return a 404 (Not found) response. Header responses of any URL can be checked using Fetch as Googlebot in Webmaster Tools or using third party tools such as the Live HTTP Headers Firefox addon or web-sniffer.net.
- Ranking for misspelled queries, e.g. local business names including typos, seems to be an area of concern. In some cases, Google’s automatic spelling correction gets the job done for users by suggesting the correct spelling. It isn’t a wise idea to stuff a site's content with every typo imaginable. It’s also not advisable to hide this or any other type of content using JavaScript, CSS or similar techniques. These methods are in violation of Google’s Webmaster Guidelines and we may take appropriate action against a site that employs them. If you’re not sure how Googlebot “sees” your pages, e.g. when using lots of JavaScript, you can get a better idea by looking at the text-only version of the cached copy in Google web search results.
- Users love fast websites. That’s why webpage loading speed is an important consideration for your users. We offer a wide range of tools and recommendations to help webmasters understand the performance of their websites and how to improve them. The easiest way to get started is to use Page Speed Online, which is the web-based version of our popular Page Speed Chrome extension. Our Let's make the web faster page has great list of resources from Google and elsewhere for improving website speed, which we recommend you to read.
We’d like to thank the TechHub team, who helped us facilitate the event, and give a big thank you to all participants. We hope you found the presentation and Q&A session interesting. We've embedded the presentation below.
And as we mentioned in the site clinic, sign up at the Google Webmaster Help Forum to discuss any further questions you might have and keep an eye on our Webmaster Central Blog.


17 comments:
Thanks for the summary, Pierre, Kaspar, and Sven. I wrote a review of the Google London Site Clinic on my blog, which includes a couple of tips not mentioned here, including how to view Google's cache of a page by typing cache:URL into Chrome's address bar.
Why can't we set a preferred domain for for .net.au I've asked this question before but never had a response.
Thanks for your great information as well. . .
thanks
Google do not provide Blogger most of the option to optimize them according to the guidance given here. While wordpress has good option for this.
thanks for sharing very useful advice.
its just like a whole guide in a nutshell
It sure would helpful to see some examples of a optimally [semantically speaking] structured website, i.e. through a flow chart or similar. Thanks for the refresher.
straightforward useful tips on SEO that every webmaster should know.
Simple SEO techniques that every webmaster should adopt. Expecting some good inputs on keyword usage.
http://www.onlinedownloads.org
Brilliant summary of going back to basics, just wish for sake of website owners more supposedly good SEOs would read this.
This is regarding sites listed by Google. I've reported several "sites" to Google that are nothing but link spam pages. Nothing has been done. Does the "sites selling links" form for Google not work? They "spam" sites are listed below:
www.affi2009-brest.com
www.hydrosymposium.org
www.btnhzone.info
www.mir-est.com
changeforpuntland.com (no www)
www.isoonet.org
www.cmacweb.org (red flagged by Mcaffee)
2010michsummit.org (no www)
www.hdsala.org
julietavenegas.us (no www)
www.tecnologiadediario.info/
@domeheid: Thanks for the summary and the constructive feedback :)
@jimboot: I am not sure why this should not be possible. Can you give a bit of a context to the question and post it on the Google webamster forum please? http://goo.gl/CHviJ
@Guppy: Thanks for trying to help us making our results even more accurate. Yes, we do take spam and paid links reports seriously, however it might take some time before changes are visible for users. Feel free to read our blog post on that topic. http://goo.gl/UZ6GD
Thanks for all the enthusiasm to offer such helpful information here.
this is great! finally i find out how to optimize my website. keep it coming.< www.1tube.my>
Thanks, Kaspar, for your response.
Would you do me a favor and take a look at just one of those sites I listed above? I've reported them (and there are now about 7 more that appear when you "Google" the following: link:aloe-vera-studies.org ) to see if I'm reporting it correctly? I filled out the form at: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/spamreport?comments=linkspam
But I don't know if I got the right form. Please let me know what you think. Thanks, David
Thanks, this is helpful for us to run the site. A good job
In the end, reporting spam sites is useless. And now another aloe vera site out of China, who didn't even appear before, has rocketed above mine in two days (LOTS of chinese languages spam links). What's the point? The rating should be simple - forget back links and focus on how long the website has been online (per domain registration) and content value.
Informative stuff. I learned more information from your blog. And i would like to see you in blogs again and again.
Post a Comment